Review for ScienceBank

For Reviewers

Paid, credited, constructive peer review — $100 default rate per completed review.

Peer review, done right

ScienceBank review is annotation-based: reviewers comment directly on the manuscript using a structured, constructive model. Your time is valued — reviewers are compensated $100 for each completed review by default.

Becoming a reviewer

Community Editors-in-Chief invite reviewers in their field. You can also signal your availability and expertise in your member profile so editors can find you.

Tools that support your review

Members serving as reviewers have access to the Peer Review Assistant — an assist-only tool that helps you write clearer, more constructive reviews. It never writes the review for you.

Recognition

In open and post-publication review communities, completed reviews can be publicly credited to you.

Why review with ScienceBank

$100

per completed review — the default reviewer rate

Assist-only AI

the Peer Review Assistant helps you write — it never authors for you

  • Paid for every review

    The default rate is $100 per completed review, with payouts you control from your settings.

  • Credited work

    In open and post-publication communities, completed reviews are publicly credited to you.

  • Assist-only AI

    The Peer Review Assistant helps you write clearer, more constructive reviews — it never writes them for you.

  • Review in your language

    The platform runs in English, Español, and Bahasa Indonesia, with translate-on-read.

  • Expert communities

    Communities are run by working researchers in your field — your review lands with peers.

  • Structured and constructive

    Annotation-based review with a structured model keeps feedback specific and useful.

Roles open right now

Communities publish calls when they are recruiting reviewers, editors, and production specialists — if one fits you, say hello.

Browse open calls
See how reviewing works